Feature
Quentin Tarantino on Bill’s Killer Camerawork
Page 2 of 3


“The hardest thing was simply capturing the movie I had in my head, which was as good as any action sequence I’ve seen in my life.”
F&V: How did you work with Bob on the look and visual style of the film?

We didn’t really change the film stocks that much in Vol. 1. We did that in Vol. 2, big time, where the whole opening sequence is in high-contrast black-and-white. The black-and-white that’s in Vol. 1, I wanted to do it on color stock so we could take the color out, as it stays in color for the Asian market and goes to black-and-white for Europe and America. I thought that’d be fun for the DVD later. So we just changed the looks all the time. I wanted the movie to be anamorphic but without using anamorphic lenses, as it’d be hard to hold the focus on stuff. So when Uma does a cool kick right, I don’t want to have to reshoot because it’s soft. I wanted to capture it all, with an anamorphic look, so then you have to shoot Super 35 and do this optical squeeze. I did that on Reservoir Dogs, and I hated the look. Then Bob said, “If we do it with a digital negative and then go to film, then you won’t have any degradation. Everything is an optical when you look at it later.” I can’t believe I’m singing the praises of this crap, as I hated it through the entire process, but now at release time I’m getting the benefit! Because normally you’d have your IP, do your negative, and maybe you strike four prints from that negative, and those are your show prints. After that, everything else is a generation down, and that’s what goes out. But with digital negatives you can make 80 or even 120 show prints from that one negative.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
F&V: You shot this in Japan and China as well as L.A. Wasn’t that difficult?

“Even though it’s all fighting, the story continues to be told through the action.”
Very, but I wanted to shoot in Beijing and China because it’s so energetic right now and I wanted to tap into that. Also, I didn’t want to shoot the Hollywood way, where every single fight scene and action set-up is mapped out ahead. I wanted to do it the Chinese way, where you just shoot till you get it. In America it’s all about the schedule. They’re like, fuck the schedule! And that’s why Hong Kong action scenes are the best in the world, alright? They don’t storyboard. They have some idea where the camera goes, and then they make it up as they go. So we spent about four months in serious pre-production, going back and forth to China and Japan, locking down all the locations, organizing local crews, sets and so on, and then we just began shooting. We originally planned to shoot for 90 days and I think we did about 160 in the end. That says it all.

“I wanted an anamorphic look — shoot Super 35 and do this optical squeeze.”
F&V: Can you talk about directing the anime section of the film?

Oh yeah, that was so much fun. I’d had a little experience with animation before in that I helped design the animated opening for Four Rooms and what was really cool about that was that I did it with Chuck Jones. Bob Kurtz directed it and did the animation on it, and I still think that that is one of the most effective pieces of the movie. So for this one, I didn’t want to just write a script and hand it to a production guy and say, “Okay, take it and make it.” No, no, this is important to me and I want to have the fun of doing anime and I love anime, but I can’t do storyboards because I can’t really draw and that’s what they live and die on. So, what I did is that I took a script and I wrote it exactly, shot for shot, because it’s all about shots. Every visual connected with this and this and this. So, I wrote a big, long, detailed script broken down into shots like you would do with a storyboard. Then, I got together with the animators at Production IG, one of Japan’s top animation companies, and then proceeded in six hours to act out all of the cartoon. I was like, “Here are all of the shots,” and I acted out each of the shots. “She’s hanging on this, a tear drops down, and the blood,” and so on. Then they went away, did the storyboards, gave them back to me, and I went, “Okay, I like this. I don’t like this. That’s not really what I meant with this.” And so they fixed that, and once the storyboards are done, they go off and do it.

F&V: There are surprisingly few digital effects in the film.

“I wasn’t leaving till I had the kung fu version of the ‘Ride of the Valkyrie’ sequence.”
That was a big part of my whole approach — I wanted everything to be old-school and in-camera if possible. We had some wire removal done by Centro in Hong Kong and a few amputation effects. That’s it.

F&V: The House of Blue Leaves sequence is a pure action tour de force. Can you talk about how you approach a sequence like that?

I’ve always considered action directors to be the most cinematic. When it comes to a great action sequence, that’s pure cinema. That’s cinema in its purest form, although there may be other directors who get more resonance and depth of feeling and behaviour and whatever. So when it comes down to pure cinema for me, it’s a beautifully done action sequence. And I’m arrogant, man! So when I throw my hat in the ring, I want to be right up there with all the big boys. So I wasn’t going to leave till I was satisfied, till I had the kung fu version of the Apocalypse Now “Ride of the Valkyrie” helicopter sequence, alright? So I was rather hard to please. It was also tough to write, as I knew I had to capture it more or less completely on the page. Since I’d never done this before, I didn’t want to bring fight choreographers and everything in and they come up with it all and I’m just left in the dust. I had to figure out and see the fight before I brought other people in. I wanted to be able to go to Yuen Wo-Ping (the film’s martial arts adviser) and say, “This is the fight. I want you to make it better and build on it, but this is what we’re doing.’ And I wanted it to be organic, not just jumping from moment to moment, and what I like about it, even though it’s all fighting, is that the story continues to be told through the action.

F&V: This is the fifth film you’ve done with editor Sally Menke. How does that relationship work?

She does an assembly while we shoot. We began on a Kem on Reservoir Dogs, moved to Lightworks for Pulp Fiction, and then to Avid. She’s my real, truest collaborator, as I’ve always thought of editing as the same as writing. Your final draft of the script is your first cut of the film, and your final cut is the last draft of the script. So it’s like having a writing partner, and the great thing about Sally is that it’s a seamless collaboration. I don’t remember what she did, or if it was her idea or mine — it just all blends together. And she’s so good that I feel obliged to keep her in the dark during shooting, for fear that she’ll just cut the whole fuckin’ movie while I’m still shooting, and I’ll come back and no longer be needed. I’m not being polite! That’s the truth. So I don’t watch dailies with her. In fact, I don’t really watch dailies much at all — maybe just the first few weeks. I’ve gradually been cutting it down, so I didn’t watch dailies on this one at all. So I don’t tell her to look for any specific takes. I give her no guidance. I just give her the footage, and let her soak it in and find her own way.


Source: Film & Video Magazine

Prev 1 2 3 Next

Related sites: • Digital Post ProductionDigital ProducerFilm and Video MagazineHollywood Industry
Related forums:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]




 

Copyright © 2004 PBI Media, LLC. All rights reserved.

top     home     search     user forum     subscribe     media kit     contact     webmaster@digitalmedianet.com